Which Precision Screwdriver Set Brand Wins?
We compared 18 precision screwdriver set options head to head. iFixit (64-piece manual set) came out on top. See the measured results, the runner-up, the budget pick, and a link to the full test video.
iFixit (64-piece manual set)
Price shown in test: $40
Affiliate link. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
PB Swiss and Wiha (tied for second among manual sets, average finish of 3.4 each)
Price shown in test: $64
Affiliate link. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
The measured results
Every number below is read straight from the test. Scroll sideways to see all measurements. Products are listed in the order they finished.
| Product | T10H max torque to failure | Bit retention strength | T6H max torque to failure | PH00 max torque to failure | SL3.0 max torque to failure | Ergonomics/subjective ratings | No-load RPM (low / high power setting) | Motor torque output (low / high power setting) | No-load RPM | Motor torque output | T6H / PH00 / SL3.0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1iFixit 64-piece manual set$40 | 33.9 in-lb, moved into the lead among manual sets at that point | 202 g (magnetic bit retention; the transcript separately notes 'the iFixit has a very strong magnet, but the screwdriver releases the magnet at 202 grams,' the same figure given later in the general bit-retention sequence) | 7.2 in-lb, moved into the lead at that point, then broke | 4.1 in-lb, briefly the lead before being overtaken by the Wiha's 4.6 | 23.5 in-lb, gave up sooner than expected | tied with LTT for the best possible rating (1) on swivel end cap smoothness and storage case; tied with LTT for best comfort/ergonomics rating (1.5) | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested |
| 2PB Swiss$64 | not tested; kit does not include a T10H bit | no figure found in the transcript for this brand; not mentioned in the general bit-retention sequence unlike every other manual brand | 8.7 in-lb, tied for first place overall with the Wiha, described as almost as good as new afterward | 5.1 in-lb, second place overall behind the Fanttik | no figure found in the transcript for this brand | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested |
| 3Wiha 36-piece$40 | not tested; kit does not include a T10H bit | 646 g, moved into the lead over the Vessel at that point, second place overall behind the LTT | 8.7 in-lb, tied for first place overall with PB Swiss | 4.6 in-lb, moved into the lead over the iFixit, third place overall behind Fanttik and PB Swiss | 25.1 in-lb | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested |
| 4LTT$70, the most expensive manual set tested | 33.7 in-lb, within 0.2 in-lb of the iFixit, second place | two conflicting figures appear in the transcript: 612 g ('about 1.35 lb') in the magnet-specific paragraph, and 930 g ('moves into the lead... very impressive') in the general bit-retention sequence; both are recorded here rather than silently picking one, per the rule against resolving conflicting retest-style numbers unilaterally | 4.7 in-lb, notably weak despite the screwdriver body itself being praised; flutes described as just too soft | 2.6 in-lb, tip of the bit missing afterward | 20 in-lb, tip broken | tied with iFixit for the best possible rating (1) on swivel end cap smoothness and storage case; tied with iFixit for best comfort/ergonomics rating (1.5) | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested |
| 5Klein Tools 64-piece (33 precision, 16 standard, 11 nut drivers)$50 | 32 in-lb, performs above average | 510 g, third place overall | 6.8 in-lb, above average | 3.6 in-lb, above average with only minor tip damage | 21.8 in-lb, broken and bent | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested |
| 6VESSEL 36-piece$34 | 31.7 in-lb, better than average with less twisting | 396 g, moved into the lead at that point | 6.0 in-lb, second place at that point behind the Jorest | 3.9 in-lb, second place at that point | 34.2 in-lb, moved into the lead at that point, ultimately third place overall behind Soleilwear and TanSon | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested |
| 7AXTH 25-piece$10 | 32.3 in-lb, second place behind the SEDY at that point | 266 g, moved into the lead at that point | 5.2 in-lb, gave up soonest of the manual sets tested up to that point | 3.4 in-lb, second place behind the SEDY at that point | 29.5 in-lb, bit bent and broken | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested |
| 8Jorest 38-piece$10 | 28.22 in-lb, second place behind the SEDY at that point | 232 g | 6.5 in-lb, moved into the lead over SEDY and SHARDEN at that point; flutes badly damaged even though the tip held | 3.22 in-lb, tip intact but flutes damaged | 30.9 in-lb, performed well | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested |
| 9XOOL 62-piece$15 | 28.6 in-lb, trailing the SEDY and AXTH, tip twisted pretty badly | 228 g, about the same as the Jorest | 5.3 in-lb, barely outlasted the AXTH | 2.8 in-lb, tip broke off | 20.1 in-lb, weakest of the manual sets tested for this size, entire bit broken off | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested |
| 10SEDY 24-in-1$5, the least expensive set tested | 32.5 in-lb, described as not bad for a $5 precision screwdriver bit | 88 g, weakest of any brand tested for this metric | 5.9 in-lb, tip totally destroyed | 4.0 in-lb, flutes bent | not tested; no mention of this brand in the SL3.0 test section, consistent with its small 24-piece kit likely lacking this bit size | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested |
| 11SHARDEN 49-in-1$8 | 25 in-lb, the bit described as totally wrecked | 244 g | 5.9 in-lb, same as the SEDY, tip twisted and broke | 1.7 in-lb, weakest manual result for this test, tip broke off | not tested; no mention of this brand in the SL3.0 test section | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested |
| 12SK Tools 12-piece$30 | 14.9 in-lb, weakest T10H result of any brand tested, described as a very loose fit | not tested; explicitly skipped by the narrator 'since it's a screwdriver set' rather than an interchangeable bit set | 4.44 in-lb, weakest T6H result of any brand tested, bit described as undersized with very soft flutes | 2.6 in-lb, screw outlasted the tip of the screwdriver | not tested; no mention of this brand in the SL3.0 test section | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested |
| 13Soleilwear 50-in-1 cordless$35 | 40.7 in-lb, first place overall across both the manual and electric groups, described as very impressive; the bit was the first of the video to outlast the screw itself | 384 g | 7.6 in-lb, moved into third place overall behind Wiha and PB Swiss | 4.0 in-lb, better than most other brands despite catastrophic bit damage | 33.5 in-lb, 3.3 in-lb less than the TANYO | not tested | 136 forward / 140 reverse on low; just over 200 forward and reverse on high, the best RPM of any electric screwdriver at that point | 0.5 in-lb on all three attempts at low (at the torque tester's lower accuracy limit); 1.3 in-lb on all three attempts at high | not tested | not tested | not tested |
| 14TanSon$36 | 35.6 in-lb, second place overall, better than the AstroAI | 360 g | 6.6 in-lb, better than average with lots of flute damage | 3.9 in-lb | 34.5 in-lb, second place overall behind the TANYO | not tested | 169 forward / 165 reverse on low; 193 forward / 188 reverse on high | 0.4 in-lb on two of three attempts and 0.5 on the third at low; 1.3 in-lb on all three attempts at high, tied with Soleilwear and Fanttik for second-highest torque output among electrics | not tested | not tested | not tested |
| 15Fanttik$45 | 32.5 in-lb, tip broke off | 456 g, the highest of any electric screwdriver tested | 6.8 in-lb, better than most other brands, bit badly twisted | 5.2 in-lb, first place overall across both manual and electric groups | 18.7 in-lb, weakest of any brand tested for this size | not tested | about 185 forward and reverse on low; 190 forward / 189 reverse on high | 0.5 in-lb on two of three attempts and 0.6 on the third at low; 1.3 in-lb on all three attempts at high | not tested | not tested | not tested |
| 16TANYO 51-in-1$16 | 32.6 in-lb, described as a good result for a $16 screwdriver | 314 g | 5.3 in-lb, soft flutes, gave up early | 4.0 in-lb, performed well for a budget tool despite screwdriver damage | 36.8 in-lb, first place overall across both manual and electric groups, described as a strong and durable bit | not tested | not tested | not tested | 124 forward, 122 reverse (peak); has no low power setting, unlike most other electric screwdrivers in this video | 1.7 in-lb on all three attempts, the highest raw torque output of any electric screwdriver tested, which the narrator frames as a downside for delicate precision work rather than an advantage | not tested |
| 17WorkBless$20 | 31.5 in-lb, bit now twisted | no figure found in the transcript for this brand, unlike every other electric screwdriver | 7.0 in-lb, above average, flutes badly twisted but held | 4.2 in-lb, above average with minor damage | no figure found in the transcript for this brand, unlike every other electric screwdriver except the electric iFixit | not tested | not tested | not tested | 173 forward, 168 reverse (peak), moved into the lead among electrics at that point | 1.0 in-lb on all three attempts (single fixed setting, unlike the multi-level brands) | not tested |
| 18iFixit Electric Screwdriver (AAA battery powered)$16 | no figure found in the transcript for this brand, unlike every other electric screwdriver except the WorkBless | 206 g, let go early, similar to the weak 202 g result for the manual iFixit set | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | 146 forward, 150 reverse (peak), the highest RPM of any electric screwdriver tested | 0.66 in-lb on all three attempts, the lowest torque of the electric screwdrivers tested up to that point in the video | not separately tested; the bit-strength tests (T6H, PH00, SL3.0) elsewhere in the transcript reference only the manual iFixit set, and this electric unit does not include its own driver bits (the transcript notes it is compatible with 4mm bits 'which are not included') |
How it was tested
- static maximum torque to failure on a T10H bit using a calibrated digital torque tester
- bit retention strength: force in grams required to pull a driver bit free of the screwdriver's bit holder (magnetic for iFixit and LTT, mechanical retention for others)
- static maximum torque to failure on a T6H bit
- static maximum torque to failure on a PH00 Phillips bit under a fixed downward drill-press force
- static maximum torque to failure on an SL3.0 slotted bit
- no-load RPM and peak motor torque output for battery-powered/electric screwdrivers, tested at low and high power settings where available
- subjective ratings (1 = best) for swivel end cap smoothness, overall ergonomics/comfort, and storage case quality, applied to the manual sets
“The iFixit came out on top with an average finish of third place and performed very well in just about every category and would definitely be my choice for a price of around $40.”
Data notes and caveats
This video explicitly splits into two separate, narrator-acknowledged 'apples to oranges' categories: 12 manual precision screwdriver sets and 7 battery-powered/electric screwdrivers, each with its own declared winner. The top-level winner/runnerUp fields above reflect the manual category, since the video's intro specifically frames the comparison against manual precision sets (iFixit, LTT) and the manual group is tested first and most extensively (bit strength across four bit sizes plus three subjective design ratings). The electric category has its own separate, equally explicit winner: Soleilwear, described as 'the best' electric screwdriver and bits, a great value at about $35, with TanSon and Fanttik named as good alternatives; this is preserved in Soleilwear's own product notes rather than forced into the shared budgetPick/runnerUp fields, since it is not a discount alternative to the manual winner but an outright win in a separate device category. Two static bit-strength tests (T10H and PH00) are combined leaderboards spanning BOTH manual and electric products in one ranking (T10H won by Soleilwear at 40.7 in-lb; PH00 won by Fanttik at 5.2 in-lb), which is why some electric products appear in what looks like a manual-only test. Several brand names are heavily mangled by auto-captions and resolved against the description's Products Tested list using price, kit-size claims, and testing order: SEDY as 'SETI'/'STI,' SHARDEN as 'Chardan'/'Shardan,' Jorest as 'Jorist'/'Joris'/'jaws,' AXTH as 'AXT'/'ext,' XOOL as 'Zuul'/'zool'/'zule,' Wiha as 'WEIA'/'WIA'/'WA'/'the wheel,' TANYO as 'Tano'/'Tanya'/'Tananiel,' Soleilwear as 'Soloware'/'Solowware'/'Solware'/'Solid wear,' TanSon as 'Tansen,' and Fanttik as 'Fantic.' Several tests have explicit or apparent data gaps rather than invented figures: Wiha and PB Swiss's kits explicitly lack a T10H bit; SK Tools' bit-retention test was explicitly skipped by the narrator; PB Swiss and WorkBless are each missing one or two test figures (bit retention and/or SL3.0) with no clear statement of why, flagged per product rather than assumed to be a kit limitation; and the electric iFixit has no T10H figure and no separate T6H/PH00/SL3.0 results since it ships without its own bits. LTT has two conflicting bit-retention figures in the transcript (612 g in one paragraph, 930 g in another); both are preserved rather than one being silently chosen.