Which Heated Gloves Brand Wins?
We compared 16 heated gloves options head to head. SabotHeat came out on top. See the measured results, the runner-up, the budget pick, and a link to the full test video.
SabotHeat
Price shown in test: $50
Affiliate link. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
SabotHeat
Price shown in test: $50
Affiliate link. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
The measured results
Every number below is read straight from the test. Scroll sideways to see all measurements. Products are listed in the order they finished.
| Product | Size (puffiness) | Weight | Aluminum cube heat generation test (10 min, highest setting) | Freezer heat retention, no air movement (preheated 5 min, checked at 15 min, negative 22 F freezer, vs Ceapro control) | Freezer heat retention, with fan air movement (15 min, vs Ceapro control) | Battery life test (highest heat setting) | Freezer heat retention, no air movement (vs Ororo) | Freezer heat retention, with fan air movement (vs Ororo) | Battery life test | Freezer heat retention, no air movement (vs Hompress) | Freezer heat retention, with fan air movement (vs Hompress) | Grip test | Freezer heat retention, no air movement (vs Lyshion) | Freezer heat retention, with fan air movement (vs Lyshion) | Freezer heat retention, no air movement (vs Krosa) | Freezer heat retention, with fan air movement (vs Krosa) | Freezer heat retention, no air movement (vs MRAWARM) | Freezer heat retention, with fan air movement (vs MRAWARM) | Freezer heat retention, no air movement (vs MADETEC) | Freezer heat retention, with fan air movement (vs MADETEC) | Freezer heat retention, no air movement (vs Unigear) | Freezer heat retention, with fan air movement (vs Unigear) | Freezer heat retention, no air movement (vs Savior Heat) | Freezer heat retention, with fan air movement (vs Savior Heat) | Freezer heat retention, no air movement (vs Milwaukee Leather) | Freezer heat retention, with fan air movement (vs Milwaukee Leather) | Freezer heat retention, no air movement (vs Action Heat) | Freezer heat retention, with fan air movement (vs Action Heat) | Aluminum cube heat generation test (10 min, no heat source) | Freezer heat retention, no air movement (vs SabotHeat) | Freezer heat retention, with fan air movement | Freezer heat retention, no air movement (vs MATKAO) | Freezer heat retention, with fan air movement (vs MATKAO) | Freezer heat retention, no air movement (vs Royal Rose) | Freezer heat retention, with fan air movement (vs Royal Rose) | Freezer heat retention, no air movement (vs Dr. Warm) | Freezer heat retention, with fan air movement (vs Dr. Warm) | Freezer heat retention, no air movement (vs Snow Deer) | Freezer heat retention, with fan air movement (vs Snow Deer) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1SabotHeat$50 | 4.08 in (hand baseline 2.75 in), the least puffy of all the heated gloves tested per the closing recap | 444 g with batteries | started at 9.1 F, fingers close to 100 F at 5 min, finished at 29.7 F for a 20.6 F increase | got off to a great start at 88.2 F finger and 84 F palm at 5 min; at 15 min fingers 77.4 F and palm 97.7 F, versus the unheated control's 36.3 F finger and 52.7 F palm; combined recap places this entry on top for average finger plus mid hand temperature at 87.55 F | average temperature of 87.3 F, much better than the unheated control which cooled down very quickly | 243 minutes, the longest of all products tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested |
| 2Savior Heat$140 | 4.28 in | 398 g, made of 40 percent lambskin and 60 percent polyester with soft pearl insulation | started at negative 1.1 F, fingers low 70s at 5 min, finished at 20.7 F for a 21.8 F increase, about the same as Unigear and MADETEC | not tested | not tested | not tested | huge advantage over Ororo for both finger and hand warmth at 5 min; held onto the lead through 15 min, especially in the fingers, while Ororo's fingers were only about 63 F | easy win with an average temperature of 77 F compared to 55 F for Ororo | 139 minutes, tied with Snow Deer | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested |
| 3Lyshion$54 | 4.38 in | 420 g, includes a battery life indicator and claimed 3M Thinsulate insulation | started at 7.9 F, fingers only around 70 F at 5 min with little heat to the back of the hand, finished at 22.8 F for a 14.9 F increase | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | 196 minutes, stated as tied with Krosa which is also given as 196 minutes in the same sentence pair, possibly a coincidental tie or a caption duplication | lost, cooling down quickly; Hompress won easily with fingers about 22 F warmer and palm about 10 F warmer | really struggled, losing heat about as fast as the unheated control; lost easily, with its own fingers at 34.9 F versus Hompress's fingers at 63.5 F | over 15, in the second tier behind Action Heat's 16.4 | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested |
| 4Hompress$60 | about 4.1 in at introduction, 4.11 in per the closing recap, second least puffy glove behind SabotHeat | 448 g, palms covered with genuine goat leather | started at 7 F, fingers around 110 F at 5 min, finished at 42.8 F for a 35.8 F increase, the best heat generation result of every product tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | 238 minutes, second longest of all products | not tested | not tested | not tested | easy win, fingers about 22 F warmer and palm about 10 F warmer than Lyshion; recap places its fingers-only reading on top at 79.2 F | easy win with fingers at 63.5 F and palm at 86.2 F | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested |
| 5MRAWARM$61 | 4.34 in | 430 g, claims waterproof and windproof layer, 6 to 8 hour charge time | started at 6.1 F, fingers around 95 F at 5 min, finished at 29.1 F for a 23 F increase | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | 104 minutes, tied for shortest of all products with Dr. Warm and Milwaukee Leather | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | warmer palm than Krosa at 5 min but fingers cooled quickly; by 15 min had cold fingers but a warm palm, while Krosa distributed heat more evenly | fingers got very cold but the middle of the hand stayed warm; won this matchup as Krosa struggled more | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested |
| 6Krosa$80 | 4.24 in | 430 g, manufacturer claims it can heat to 167 F in only 1 minute, a claim the video sets up to test but never explicitly confirms or denies with a matching timed result | started at 6.6 F, fingers very warm at 138 F at 5 min but back of hand pretty cool, finished at 21.4 F for a 14.8 F increase, about the same as Lyshion | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | 196 minutes, described as helped by how poorly it generates heat; stated as tied with Lyshion which is also given as 196 minutes in the same sentence pair | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | warmer fingers than MRAWARM at 5 min and distributed heat more evenly by 15 min | really struggled, center of the hand dropped to a very cold 18.3 F after 15 min, the coldest single reading in the video | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested |
| 7Unigear$80 | almost 4.5 in at introduction | 440 g, 3M Thinsulate insulation, goatskin leather outer | started at 5.5 F, fingers around 94 F at 5 min but back of hand cool, finished at 27.1 F for a 21.6 F increase, tied with MADETEC | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | 142 minutes | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | performed well but MADETEC held a small lead at 5 min; lost narrowly at 15 min with an average of 80.9 F versus MADETEC's almost 82 F | barely won at 15 min with an average temperature of 66 F compared to 64 F for MADETEC | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested |
| 8MADETEC$85 | 4.4 in | 482 g, the heaviest product tested; includes a battery usage display and touchscreen material | started at 3.4 F, fingers around 95 F at 5 min but a very clear cold spot at the aluminum cube location, finished at 25 F for a 21.6 F increase, tied with Unigear; recap places it third overall for the metal cube test at a 24.4 F increase attributed instead to the Dr. Warm glove liner | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | 163 minutes | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | held a small lead over Unigear at 5 min and won narrowly at 15 min with an average of almost 82 F (81.95 F per the recap) versus Unigear's 80.9 F; recap places its fingers-only reading second at 78.1 F | lost narrowly at 15 min with an average of 64 F versus Unigear's 66 F | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested |
| 9Ororo$120 | 4.4 in, the lightest glove tested | 394 g, water resistant shell, soft fleece lining, 1800 mA hour battery | started at 2.8 F, fingers low 70s and back of hand low 50s at 5 min, finished at 24.1 F for a 21.3 F increase | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | 169 minutes | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | lost, with fingers only around 63 F at 15 min while Savior Heat held a strong lead | lost badly, fingers cooled off very quickly, finishing with an average temperature of 55 F versus Savior Heat's 77 F | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested |
| 10Action Heat$150 | 4.5 in, the puffiest glove tested | 366 g, very light; 3M Thinsulate insulation | started at negative 0.8 F, fingers high 90s at 5 min but a cold spot at the back of the hand, finished at 17.4 F for only an 18.2 F increase, the weakest heat generation increase among the gloves in its own testing segment | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | 108 minutes, second shortest of all products | not tested | not tested | 16.4, the best grip of every product tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | small advantage over Milwaukee Leather at 5 min; both struggled to keep fingers warm, both cooled off quite a bit by 15 min with the hand area around 75 F | practically tied at 5 min, but won at 15 min with an average of 56 F versus 50 F for Milwaukee Leather | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested |
| 11Milwaukee Leather$170 | 4.15 in, less puffy than most other gloves | 404 g, 2500 mA hour batteries, no battery level indicator | started at 4.3 F, fingers around 115 F at 5 min, finished at 31.3 F for a 27 F increase, confirmed by the recap as the second best heat generation result of every product tested behind Hompress | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | 104 minutes, tied for shortest of all products with MRAWARM and Dr. Warm | not tested | not tested | over 15, in the second tier behind Action Heat's 16.4 | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | started slightly behind Action Heat, struggled to keep fingers warm, cooled quite a bit by 15 min | lost, fingers cooling down very fast, finished with an average of 50 F versus 56 F for Action Heat | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested |
| 12Ceapro unheated control$22 | 4.48 in, almost as puffy as Unigear | 140 g, ordinary unheated glove rated for weather down to negative 30 F | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | started at 3 F, back of hand low 40s and fingers 50s at 5 min, finished at 13.8 F for only a 10.8 F increase, the weakest of every product tested, as expected for an unheated control | fingers and palm just over 72 F at 5 min but temperature dropped fast; by 15 min fingers were down to 36.3 F and palm 52.7 F | described only as cooling down very quickly versus SabotHeat, no specific temperature figure given | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested |
| 13Royal Rose Glove Liner$95 | not given as a specific figure for this product alone; described only as a lot less puffy than the gloves generally | 352 g, windproof and waterproof outer layer, touchscreen, wear resistant, non slip claims | started at negative 0.2 F, fingers mid 90s at 5 min with a cold spot at the back of the hand, finished at 23.5 F for a 23.7 F increase, described as better than most of the gloves | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | 140 minutes, the last of the glove liners to run out | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | easy win, fingers and palm around 10 F warmer than MATKAO after 15 min | won, both liners losing heat quickly but this one held heat better; both fingers and hands were pretty cold regardless | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested |
| 14MATKAO Glove Liner$99 | 3.5 in per the closing recap, the least puffy of every product tested, gloves and liners combined | 314 g, very light; 93 percent polyester, 5 percent spandex; includes a power alert and a 4 bar battery indicator | started at 6.3 F, fingers in the 120s at 5 min but not much heat to the back of the hand, finished at 29.7 F for a 23.4 F increase | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | 126 minutes, just over 2 hours | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | lost, losing temperature quickly throughout the test | lost, losing heat quickly | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested |
| 15Snow Deer Glove Liner$110 | 3.54 in, second least puffy of every product tested | 276 g, the lightest product tested; 92 percent polyester, 8 percent elastane, thin enough to use as driving gloves | started at 6.4 F, plenty of heat to the fingers at 5 min but the back of the hand pretty cold, finished at 29.7 F for a 23.3 F increase, nearly identical to MATKAO's result | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | 139 minutes, tied with the real Savior Heat | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | fairly even at 5 min, both liners struggled to keep fingers warm; lost to Dr. Warm, fingers pretty cold for both | fingers became cold very quickly and the middle of the hand lost heat quickly; lost narrowly with an average of 38.5 F versus 41.8 F for Dr. Warm | not tested | not tested |
| 16Dr. Warm Glove Liner$110 | 3.68 in | 298 g, double layer form fitting design, made in China | fingers around 110 F at 5 min, finished at 25.4 F for a 24.4 F increase, described as the best of all the glove liners and confirmed by the recap as the third best result overall behind Hompress and Milwaukee Leather; no starting temperature figure is given for this product, unlike every other product tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | 104 minutes, tied for shortest of all products with MRAWARM and Milwaukee Leather | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | not tested | did a great job with the middle of the hand and beat Snow Deer, though fingers were pretty cold for both | won narrowly with an average of 41.8 F versus 38.5 F for Snow Deer |
How it was tested
- aluminum cube heat generation test on highest heat setting, 10 minutes
- size and puffiness measurement in inches versus a bare hand baseline
- weight measurement with batteries installed
- freezer heat retention test with no air movement, negative 22 F freezer, preheated 5 minutes, checked at 15 minutes, paired matchups plus an unheated control
- freezer heat retention test with fan air movement, same setup with a fan blowing air across the glove
- touchscreen capability test (all products passed)
- grip strength test using a clamp and scale on a flat piece of iron
- battery life test on highest heat setting until fully drained
“As it turns out, the least expensive glove, the Savior Heat, costing $50, outperformed the more expensive gloves that cost over 150.”
Data notes and caveats
16 total products (15 heated brands plus the unheated Ceapro control). Major brand resolution challenge: the transcript captions two different products (the $50 winner and a separate $140 product) with the identical string Savior Heat; resolved via the video's own chapter markers, which spell the $50 product Sabot Heat correctly, and via the description's explicit SabotHeat (Winner) tag. Additional caption drift within the single video (not separate brands, same product renamed partway through): Hampress became Hot Hands (and the recap mislabeled a repeated 35.8 F figure as belonging to Hot Hands rather than Hampress), Croozer became Krossa/Krosa, MadeTech became MayTech, Royal Rose became Aurora Rose, and Arovo became Aurora (Ororo). Only 3 of 16 products have named chapter markers, so chapterMap is false despite those 3 chapters correctly confirming brand spellings. Hompress was the strongest all-around performer aside from the winner (best raw heat generation at 35.8 F, second best battery life at 238 minutes) but the video never explicitly names a runner-up, so runnerUp is left null rather than inferred. The manufacturer claim that Krosa can heat to 167 F within 1 minute is set up as something to test but never explicitly confirmed or denied against a matching timed reading.