Which Gun Cleaner Lubricant Protectant (CLP) Brand Wins?
A head-to-head test of 9 gun cleaner lubricant protectant (clp) options with the measured results for each. See how they ranked and watch the full test video.
Some figures on this page were transcribed from the test video and have not been independently re-verified. Treat the numbers as a close guide and watch the full video for the exact readings.
Clenzoil
Price shown in test: $17 for 8 oz, $2.13 per oz
Affiliate link. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
The measured results
Every number below is read straight from the test. Scroll sideways to see all measurements. Products are listed in the order they finished.
| Product | Lubricity and wear scar test | Carbon buildup cleaning test | Dust attraction test | Cold temperature test, negative 40F for 12 hours | Corrosion resistance test with prior heat exposure | Corrosion resistance test without heat exposure |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Clenzoil$17 for 8 oz, $2.13 per oz | 1.81 mm wear scar, best of all 9 brands tested, tester never exceeded 400 watts, about 100 watts less friction than the Ballistol | terrific job, slightly better than the Ballistol | performed slightly better than the Ballistol but not quite as well as the Break Free CLP | frozen solid, failed the test | 4th place | 4th place |
| 2Break Free CLP$10 for 4 oz, $2.50 per oz | 4.15 mm wear scar, second best of all brands tested, tester briefly hit 478 watts before dropping to around 400 | terrific job, traces of the product continued dissolving carbon even after the test finished | 1st place with an A minus rating, best of all brands tested | passed easily, described as a great lubricant for cold temperatures | 8th place, struggled, just ahead of the Ballistol | 9th place, worst of all brands, more corrosion than most |
| 3Extreme Force$15 for 3.4 oz, $4.41 per oz | 5.02 mm wear scar, third best of all brands tested, tester needed just over 480 watts | performed very well, not quite as well as the Hoppe's | collected a little more dust than most other brands, performed about the same as the Ballistol | extremely solid, failed the test | 3rd place, very little corrosion | 6th place, more corrosion than average |
| 4Frog Lube$13 for 4 oz, $3.25 per oz | 5.67 mm wear scar, fourth best of all brands tested, tester briefly hit 487 watts | did a great job despite its higher viscosity | performed about the same as the Clenzoil, B+ tier | was a paste before freezing and became very hard, failed the test | 1st place, heat exposure actually helped it absorb into the metal, very little corrosion | 2nd place, very little corrosion |
| 5Fluid Filmless than $1 per oz | 6.59 mm wear scar, fifth best of all brands tested, tester exceeded 500 watts | terrific job breaking down carbon, performed as well as the other brands, A+ tier | performed slightly better than the Hoppe's kit lubricant, B+ tier | very high viscosity at room temperature, froze solid, failed the test | 5th place, the heat was too much for it | 1st place, best of all brands tested at blocking corrosion |
| 6Ballistol$15 for 16 oz, $0.94 per oz | 7.26 mm wear scar, worst film strength of the brands tested up to that point, tester used nearly 500 watts, quite a bit of metal in the test cup | made easy work of the carbon buildup, cutting almost to the metal | performed about the same as the Extreme Force, B+ tier | does not like the cold, froze solid, failed the test | 8th place, worst of all brands tested, appeared to burn off in the oven with as much corrosion as the unprotected control panel | 8th place, better than the unprotected control but not nearly as well as most other brands |
| 7Slip 2000$17 for 6 oz, $2.83 per oz | 7.41 mm wear scar, tester needed over 500 watts, more friction than all other brands tested up to that point, quite a bit of metal in the container | did a great job cutting through the carbon | performed slightly worse than the Break Free CLP, B+ tier | passed, did not flow as well as the Break Free CLP but definitely passed | 7th place, quite a bit of corrosion | 7th place, quite a bit of corrosion but better than the Break Free CLP |
| 8Hoppe's No. 9 CLP$8 for 2 oz, $4 per oz | 7.72 mm wear scar, tester exceeded 500 watts, quite a bit of friction and metal grinding noise | the best of all brands tested up to that point, A+ tier along with the Fluid Film | collected a little more dust than most other brands, similar to the Ballistol | passed, shrugged off the cold and flowed just as well as the Break Free CLP | 6th place, really struggled to block corrosion after heat exposure | 5th place, a little more corrosion than average |
| 9Hoppe's No. 9 Kit$19 | 8.52 mm wear scar, worst of all 9 brands tested, tester hit 518 watts, the highest of all brands, quite a bit of metal flake in the test cup | performed very well, similar to the standalone Hoppe's CLP | performed slightly worse than the Fluid Film, B+ tier | just as frozen as the Extreme Force, failed the test | 2nd place, very little corrosion | 3rd place, did a little better than average |
How it was tested
- lubricity and wear scar test using a lubricity tester
- carbon buildup cleaning test on highly carbonized metal
- dust attraction test after driving on a gravel road
- cold temperature flow test at negative 40F for 12 hours
- corrosion resistance test with hydrogen peroxide, vinegar, and salt, tested with and without prior heat exposure at 400F for 1 hour
“So, which brand is the best? I think that really depends on what you're looking for. Unfortunately, none of the brands were perfect. However, there were quite a few brands that performed very well. Two of the brands that really stood out to me include the Clean-Oil as well as the Break Free CLP.”
More Shop Chemicals & Lubricants
Which Brake Parts Cleaner Brand Wins?
Gunk (Chlorinated)
See the resultsWhich Oil Spill Absorbent Brand Wins?
16 products tested
See the resultsWhich Hand Cleaners Brand Wins?
Permatex Fast Orange Extreme
See the results