2023 test4 productsFuel & Additives

Which Gasoline Octane Grade Brand Wins?

A head-to-head test of 4 gasoline octane grade options with the measured results for each. See how they ranked and watch the full test video.

The verdict
Budget pick

87 Octane

Check price on Amazon

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.

The measured results

Every number below is read straight from the test. Scroll sideways to see all measurements. Products are listed in the order they finished.

ProductEthanol content testFuel efficiency (Honda inverter generator, halogen light load)Static pull force before timing advanceAcceleration before timing advance (three 100ft passes towing a garden tractor)Static pull force after 12 degree timing advanceAcceleration after timing advance
187 Octane Casey's General Store, dedicated fuel hosevery close to 9 percentran 28 minutes 15 seconds before running out of fuel241 lb (about 109 kg)40ft split 4.9 seconds; passes of 8.62, 8.57, and 8.36 seconds for a three pass average of 8.5 seconds, the slowest average of the four fuels tested256 lb, about 6 percent more force than before the timing advance40ft split 4.5 seconds; passes of 7.84, 7.79, and 7.74 seconds for a three pass average of 7.79 seconds, the slowest average of the four fuels but a large improvement from before the timing advance
291 Octane No Ethanol Casey's General Store, dedicated fuel hose0 percent, the fuel did not turn cloudy in the tester, confirming the no ethanol label as advertisedran 28 minutes flat, about 15 seconds less than the 87 octane240 lb, within 1 lb of the 87 octane's result40ft split 4.9 seconds (tied with 87 octane); passes of 8.36 (tying 87 octane's fastest pass), 8.1, and 8.1 seconds for a three pass average of 8.19 seconds264 lb, the highest of all four fuels, performing even better than the 87 octane40ft split 4.43 seconds; passes of 7.84 (matching the 87 octane's first pass), 7.53 (the fastest time yet at that point), and 7.53 seconds (the third pass had to be re-run after an on camera interruption and matched the second pass exactly) for a three pass average of 7.63 seconds
391 Octanevery close to 9 percent, the same as the 87 octaneran out of fuel first among the four fuels, at 27 minutes 53 seconds244 lb, the highest yet in the pre timing advance test40ft split 4.7 seconds (fastest yet at that point); passes of 8.15, 8.0 flat (fastest yet at that point), and 8.2 seconds for a three pass average of 8.12 seconds, the fastest average of the four fuels before the timing advance258 lb, quite a bit better than before the timing advance40ft split 4.38 seconds; passes of 7.74, 7.53 (tying the fastest time yet), and 7.58 seconds for a three pass average of 7.63 seconds, nearly identical to the 91 octane no ethanol result
4Amaco Gold (sp?) 93 Octaneright at 10 percentoutlasted the 87 octane by about 3 seconds, running about 28 minutes 18 seconds, the longest of the four fuels though all four finished within about 20 seconds of each other, which the narrator calls too close to call241 lb, about the same as the other octanes40ft split 4.74 seconds; passes of 8.15, 8.0 flat (matching the fastest time), and 8.15 seconds for a three pass average of 8.1 seconds, tied for the fastest average of the four fuels before the timing advanceno valid result; the drive belt was not warmed up enough and was slipping during the first attempt, and the narrator explicitly discarded that result after noting it was capable of more than 245 lbretested with a fully warmed up drive belt; 40ft split 4.22 seconds, the fastest 40ft split of all four fuels; passes of 7.53 (tying the fastest time yet), 7.74, and 7.63 seconds for a three pass average of 7.63 seconds, tied with both 91 octane variants

How it was tested

  • ethanol content test using a water separation ethanol tester
  • fuel efficiency using a Honda inverter generator under a fixed halogen light load, run to empty with a precisely measured amount of fuel
  • static pull/torque force test using a Honda GX200 engine, both before and after a 12 degree ignition timing advance
  • acceleration over three 100ft passes towing a garden tractor on a trailer, both before and after the timing advance
  • supplementary acceleration comparison without towing the trailer, before and after the timing advance (aggregate result only, no per octane numbers given)

My suggestion is to buy the 87 octane unless your vehicle requires a higher octane fuel for example if your vehicle has a turbo it probably needs something higher than an 87 octane.

From the test video verdict.
Data notes and caveats

This video compares gasoline octane grades (87, 91 no ethanol, 91 with ethanol, and 93) rather than branded products in the usual sense; the 93 octane's brand name (Amaco/Yamaco Gold in the transcript) could not be resolved against a description product list since the description only lists ancillary equipment (fuel cans, ethanol tester), not the fuel brands, so it is kept as a phonetic guess. On raw acceleration and post timing advance torque numbers, the three higher octane fuels (both 91s and the 93) essentially tied with each other and edged out the 87 octane by a small, consistent margin (about three tenths of a second per acceleration pass); fuel efficiency across all four octanes was within about 20 seconds of each other and explicitly called too close to call by the narrator. Given this, no single octane is declared an outright winner; instead the narrator gives a practical purchase recommendation to buy the cheaper 87 octane unless a vehicle specifically requires higher octane, which is captured here as budgetPick rather than forcing a winner onto the small performance differences. One number required an unambiguous correction: the 87 octane's first post timing advance pass is transcribed as '71.84 seconds,' which is clearly a caption glitch (an inserted extra digit) since the surrounding math only works if the value is 7.84 seconds (the narrator's own stated three pass average of 7.79 seconds, and the final recap's explicit '87's fastest pass was 7.74 seconds' for the third pass, both confirm this). The 93 octane's post timing advance torque test was explicitly discarded on camera by the narrator due to a slipping, not fully warmed up drive belt, not a caption or data gap.

More Fuel & Additives