Which Gasoline Octane Grade Brand Wins?
A head-to-head test of 4 gasoline octane grade options with the measured results for each. See how they ranked and watch the full test video.
87 Octane
Affiliate link. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
The measured results
Every number below is read straight from the test. Scroll sideways to see all measurements. Products are listed in the order they finished.
| Product | Ethanol content test | Fuel efficiency (Honda inverter generator, halogen light load) | Static pull force before timing advance | Acceleration before timing advance (three 100ft passes towing a garden tractor) | Static pull force after 12 degree timing advance | Acceleration after timing advance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 187 Octane Casey's General Store, dedicated fuel hose | very close to 9 percent | ran 28 minutes 15 seconds before running out of fuel | 241 lb (about 109 kg) | 40ft split 4.9 seconds; passes of 8.62, 8.57, and 8.36 seconds for a three pass average of 8.5 seconds, the slowest average of the four fuels tested | 256 lb, about 6 percent more force than before the timing advance | 40ft split 4.5 seconds; passes of 7.84, 7.79, and 7.74 seconds for a three pass average of 7.79 seconds, the slowest average of the four fuels but a large improvement from before the timing advance |
| 291 Octane No Ethanol Casey's General Store, dedicated fuel hose | 0 percent, the fuel did not turn cloudy in the tester, confirming the no ethanol label as advertised | ran 28 minutes flat, about 15 seconds less than the 87 octane | 240 lb, within 1 lb of the 87 octane's result | 40ft split 4.9 seconds (tied with 87 octane); passes of 8.36 (tying 87 octane's fastest pass), 8.1, and 8.1 seconds for a three pass average of 8.19 seconds | 264 lb, the highest of all four fuels, performing even better than the 87 octane | 40ft split 4.43 seconds; passes of 7.84 (matching the 87 octane's first pass), 7.53 (the fastest time yet at that point), and 7.53 seconds (the third pass had to be re-run after an on camera interruption and matched the second pass exactly) for a three pass average of 7.63 seconds |
| 391 Octane | very close to 9 percent, the same as the 87 octane | ran out of fuel first among the four fuels, at 27 minutes 53 seconds | 244 lb, the highest yet in the pre timing advance test | 40ft split 4.7 seconds (fastest yet at that point); passes of 8.15, 8.0 flat (fastest yet at that point), and 8.2 seconds for a three pass average of 8.12 seconds, the fastest average of the four fuels before the timing advance | 258 lb, quite a bit better than before the timing advance | 40ft split 4.38 seconds; passes of 7.74, 7.53 (tying the fastest time yet), and 7.58 seconds for a three pass average of 7.63 seconds, nearly identical to the 91 octane no ethanol result |
| 4Amaco Gold (sp?) 93 Octane | right at 10 percent | outlasted the 87 octane by about 3 seconds, running about 28 minutes 18 seconds, the longest of the four fuels though all four finished within about 20 seconds of each other, which the narrator calls too close to call | 241 lb, about the same as the other octanes | 40ft split 4.74 seconds; passes of 8.15, 8.0 flat (matching the fastest time), and 8.15 seconds for a three pass average of 8.1 seconds, tied for the fastest average of the four fuels before the timing advance | no valid result; the drive belt was not warmed up enough and was slipping during the first attempt, and the narrator explicitly discarded that result after noting it was capable of more than 245 lb | retested with a fully warmed up drive belt; 40ft split 4.22 seconds, the fastest 40ft split of all four fuels; passes of 7.53 (tying the fastest time yet), 7.74, and 7.63 seconds for a three pass average of 7.63 seconds, tied with both 91 octane variants |
How it was tested
- ethanol content test using a water separation ethanol tester
- fuel efficiency using a Honda inverter generator under a fixed halogen light load, run to empty with a precisely measured amount of fuel
- static pull/torque force test using a Honda GX200 engine, both before and after a 12 degree ignition timing advance
- acceleration over three 100ft passes towing a garden tractor on a trailer, both before and after the timing advance
- supplementary acceleration comparison without towing the trailer, before and after the timing advance (aggregate result only, no per octane numbers given)
“My suggestion is to buy the 87 octane unless your vehicle requires a higher octane fuel for example if your vehicle has a turbo it probably needs something higher than an 87 octane.”
Data notes and caveats
This video compares gasoline octane grades (87, 91 no ethanol, 91 with ethanol, and 93) rather than branded products in the usual sense; the 93 octane's brand name (Amaco/Yamaco Gold in the transcript) could not be resolved against a description product list since the description only lists ancillary equipment (fuel cans, ethanol tester), not the fuel brands, so it is kept as a phonetic guess. On raw acceleration and post timing advance torque numbers, the three higher octane fuels (both 91s and the 93) essentially tied with each other and edged out the 87 octane by a small, consistent margin (about three tenths of a second per acceleration pass); fuel efficiency across all four octanes was within about 20 seconds of each other and explicitly called too close to call by the narrator. Given this, no single octane is declared an outright winner; instead the narrator gives a practical purchase recommendation to buy the cheaper 87 octane unless a vehicle specifically requires higher octane, which is captured here as budgetPick rather than forcing a winner onto the small performance differences. One number required an unambiguous correction: the 87 octane's first post timing advance pass is transcribed as '71.84 seconds,' which is clearly a caption glitch (an inserted extra digit) since the surrounding math only works if the value is 7.84 seconds (the narrator's own stated three pass average of 7.79 seconds, and the final recap's explicit '87's fastest pass was 7.74 seconds' for the third pass, both confirm this). The 93 octane's post timing advance torque test was explicitly discarded on camera by the narrator due to a slipping, not fully warmed up drive belt, not a caption or data gap.
More Fuel & Additives
Which Fuel Stabilizer (plus A Separate 1-year Headlight Restoration Kit Durability Check-in) Brand Wins?
Sta-Bil
See the resultsWhich Diesel Anti Gel Fuel Additive Brand Wins?
Hot Shot's Secret
See the resultsWhich Small Gas Engine Brand Wins?
Honda GX200
See the results