Which Engine Oil Additive Claims Brand Wins?
A head-to-head test of 2 engine oil additive claims options with the measured results for each. See how they ranked and watch the full test video.
Slick 50 engine treatment / oil additive
Affiliate link. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
The measured results
Every number below is read straight from the test. Scroll sideways to see all measurements. Products are listed in the order they finished.
| Product | Dosage used | Drained oil appearance | Operating temperature test (engine at full temp, before draining) | Dry-crankcase torture test (both engines fully drained, run with zero oil until seizure) | Amount used | Operating temperature test | Dry-crankcase torture test |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Slick 50 engine treatment / oil additive | package instructions call for 10% if the vehicle holds 6 quarts or more; tester instead used about 20% (4 oz of Slick 50 concentrate added to reach a 20 oz total fill for the small lawnmower engine) | a lot darker than the SAE 30, described as clearly almost black | kept the engine noticeably cooler than the plain-oil engine; cylinder head and crankcase temperatures were both down, running about 10, 20, 30 degrees cooler or more than the engine without Slick 50 | seized/locked up way quicker than the SAE 30 engine; reached 420 degrees F with visible smoke at the point of lockup; both engines combined seized within about 7 minutes of starting the test | not tested | not tested | not tested |
| 2SAE 30-weight oil (conventional, no additive) regular motor oil, used as the control/baseline | not tested | more of a brown color, lighter than the near-black Slick 50 oil | not tested | not tested | about 20 oz to fill the second (control) engine | ran hotter than the Slick 50-treated engine by about 10, 20, 30 degrees or more | outlasted the Slick 50 engine, seizing after the Slick 50 engine had already locked up |
How it was tested
- operating temperature comparison (cylinder head and crankcase temperature) between the Slick 50-pretreated engine and the plain SAE 30 engine, both at full operating temperature before draining
- dry-crankcase torture test: both engines' oil fully drained, then run simultaneously (started a few seconds apart) until each seizes, to see which lasts longer with zero oil
Data notes and caveats
This is a myth-test of Slick 50's own marketing claims (reduces heat, lets an engine run without oil) using two otherwise-identical small engines as test subjects, not a ranked comparison of competing purchasable brands, so per the myth-test rule winner/runnerUp/budgetPick are left null rather than forced onto either engine. The video's two sub-tests point opposite directions: Slick 50 ran measurably cooler with oil present, but seized first (failed the core 'runs without oil' claim) once both crankcases were fully drained - both outcomes are preserved in each product's own results/notes rather than collapsed into a single winner field. Meta chapters ('Slick 50 runs cooler than SAE 30', 'Slick 50 engine begins to slow', 'Sudden death of engine at 02:44') align cleanly with the transcript's narrative order, so chapterMap is true. Transcript is clean throughout with no brand-name garbling or numeric ambiguity requiring a flag; confidence is high even though the video itself only gives coarse figures ('10, 20, 30 degrees or more', 'about 7 minutes') rather than precise numbers for the seizure-time gap.