2024 test8 productsCar Care & Detailing

Which Ceramic Coating Brand Wins?

We compared 8 ceramic coating options head to head. Adam's came out on top. See the measured results, the runner-up, the budget pick, and a link to the full test video.

The verdict
Winner

Adam's

Price shown in test: $150, the most expensive coating tested

Check price on Amazon

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.

Runner-up

Nano Bond

Price shown in test: $38

Check price on Amazon

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.

Budget pick

Hybrid Solutions

Price shown in test: $15

Check price on Amazon

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.

The measured results

Every number below is read straight from the test. Scroll sideways to see all measurements. Products are listed in the order they finished.

ProductClaimsSlickness freshBeading mid-video assessmentStrip washIron removerBug and tar removerWheel and tire cleanerDegreaserFinal slicknessFinal warm/hot water exposureBaseline (bare paint)Beading (polycarbonate)
1Adam's$150, the most expensive coating testedkit includes surface prep, graphene boost, and coating, plus applicators and microsuede/plush towels; claims 9 years of protection, 10H hardness, extremely hydrophobic, and 110% satisfaction1.7 lb of force to slide the spongecame out on top in this roundby far the best yet, not even close to the runner up, a definitive winstill performing just as good as new with nothing but water beadsstill looks as good as new with only water beads, even under heavy spray; remained on top without water forming a sheetperforming by far the best so far, mostly water beadingstill doing a great job, only a small water sheet formed and cleared in about a second, a clear win over Nano Bond2.1 lb, taking the lead from the Nano Bondwater is not able to form a sheet, came out on top for warm and hot water exposurenot testednot tested
2Nano Bond$38includes sponge, microfiber towel, microsuede applicator, and gloves; claims outstanding water beading and up to 36 months of protection3.3 lb, not nearly as slick as the spray-on productsperformed well, finished in second place behind Adam'sstill performing very well, water forming beads across the entire test areaholding up the best so far, water forming mostly beadsperforming even better than Hybrid Solutions, clearing in only 4 seconds; final summary places it second in this round at 4 secondsperforming the best so far, water unable to form a sheet over the entire test areaexperienced quite a bit of damage but was still providing protection, taking 15 seconds for the water sheet to clear versus about a second for Adam's, a win for Adam's2.4 lb, the best so far before Adam's was retested at 2.1 lbsmall sheet formed and cleared in 3 seconds, the fastest yet at that point, finishing second behind Adam'snot testednot tested
3Hybrid Solutions$15claims extreme water repellency and long-lasting protection over 6 months1.5 lb, finished in first place in this roundtied for third place with Cerakotecontinues to demonstrate excellent hydrophobic qualities, performing wellstill performing well though the iron remover had an impact; held up a little better than Cerakotedamage occurred but water still beaded; took 15 seconds for the water sheet to dissipatewater forming a sheet, pretty much used upnot tested3.5 lb, performed just a little better than Shine Armor's 3.7 lba much smaller sheet formed and cleared in only 4 secondsnot testednot tested
4Cerakote$17claims unsurpassed slickness and to be extremely hydrophobic; cures in about 2 hours2 lb, moved into second place at that point in the sequencetied for third place with Hybrid Solutions; too close to call against Hybrid Solutions; performed better than Chemical Guys in a side by sideperforming very well, doing a little better than Chemical Guys with a tighter water beadperforming well, though Hybrid Solutions held up slightly betterseemed to take more damage than Hybrid Solutions; needed a full minute for the water to dissipateused up, a sheet of water covering the entire test areanot tested3.8 lb, same as Chemical Guysperformed very close to Hybrid Solutions, water dissipated in close to 5 secondsnot testednot tested
5Chemical Guys$25manufacturer claims extreme hyperactive water beading and protection against UV rays, extreme weather, and contamination1.6 lb, moved into second place at that point, only a tenth of a pound behind Hybrid Solutionslooked really good, but Hybrid Solutions and Cerakote may have been a little betterwater beading nicely, though Cerakote did a little better; water beginning to form a sheetalmost as good as Cerakoteexperienced a lot of damage, a sheet of water formed quickly, needed a full minute to dissipatechemicals definitely took their tollnot tested3.8 lb, same as Cerakotesheet of water cleared up in about 7 secondsnot testednot tested
6Shine Armor$8, the cheapest coating testedclaims to offer a waterless coat and shine, includes two microfiber towels2.4 lb, quite a bit better than bare paintnot testedpretty much destroyed the coating, a solid sheet of water formed with only a light sprayreally disarmed its protection, almost used upcompletely used up, no protection leftnot testedone of the first four spray-and-wipe coatings, appeared completely used up3.7 lb, up from 2.1 lb when freshtook its toll, about 13 seconds for the water sheet to dissipateunprotected paint took 4.5 lb of force for the sponge to slidenot tested
7TopCoat F-11 Pro$60kit includes a 16 oz spray bottle, 2 oz travel bottle, and two microfiber towels; claims to be the most advanced water-based ceramic coating; supposed to last up to 12 months2 lb, same as Cerakotenot testedforming mostly a sheet across the test area, Nano Bond performed quite a bit betterstill offering a little protection but water mostly forming a sheetappeared completely used upnot testedpretty much used up3.2 lba larger sheet of water formed, took 7 seconds to clearnot testedmost of the water beaded but there was more sheeting compared to most other brands; performed worse than Nano Bond in a side by side
8Advanced Graphene$90claims to last up to 10 years, includes two microfiber towels and a couple pairs of glovesnot stated in the transcript; the fresh-slickness recap names Shine Armor, Hybrid Solutions, Cerakote, Chemical Guys, Nanobond, F-11, and Adam's but omits an Advanced Graphene figurenot testedstill performing well though water began sheeting in some areas; better than the F11still trailing Hybrid Solutions, Cerakote, and Chemical Guyswater quickly formed a sheet under a light spray; took close to 45 seconds for the sheet to dissipatepretty much used uppretty much used up3.1 lbperformed about the same as the F-11, around 7 secondsnot testedperformed better than the F11 but not quite as well as Hybrid Solutions and Cerakote; won a side by side against the F11 when its water sheet cleared faster

How it was tested

  • baseline unprotected paint slickness using a 5 lb weighted sponge, force in lb to slide
  • fresh-coating slickness with the same sponge test after full cure
  • polycarbonate headlight-panel slickness and water beading, including simulated warm and hot water dishwasher exposure around 120F
  • visual water beading and sheeting assessment on the coated hood before chemical exposure
  • resistance to Strip Wash (a strong car wash soap)
  • resistance to iron remover
  • resistance to Bug and Tar Remover, with timed water-sheet dissipation
  • resistance to wheel and tire cleaner
  • resistance to degreaser, the toughest chemical test, narrowed to the top two finishers
  • final slickness re-test and timed water-sheet dissipation after roughly 4.5 hours of combined warm and hot water spray exposure

So, which ceramic coating is the best? And the Adam's totally dominated the showdown finishing in first place.

From the test video verdict.

More Car Care & Detailing