Which AA Battery Brand Wins?
We compared 10 aa battery options head to head. Energizer came out on top. See the measured results, the runner-up, the budget pick, and a link to the full test video.
Energizer
Price shown in test: 75 cent
Affiliate link. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Amazon Basics
Affiliate link. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
The measured results
Every number below is read straight from the test. Scroll sideways to see all measurements. Products are listed in the order they finished.
| Product | Discharge Test 300m A | Discharge Test 100m A | Value Per Penny 100m A | Value Per Penny 300m A |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Energizer Lithiumabout $1.50 each | 723 minutes, 3,317 milliamp hours, described as beating all the alkaline batteries by a long shot | 2,081 minutes, 3,152 milliamp hours, described as lasting twice as long as the competition | not tested | not tested |
| 2Energizer75 cent | 411 minutes, 1,888 milliamp hours, described as beating the regular Duracell, the Duracell Quantum, and every other battery tested up to that point at this rate | 1,329 minutes, 2,026 milliamp hours, second place behind the Duracell Quantum | nearly 28 milliamps per penny, second best value behind Amazon Basics | not tested |
| 3Rayovac Fusion | 410 minutes, 1,884 milliamp hours, finished nearly in a tie with the Duracell Quantum in a head to head test where both brands claim no alkaline battery lasts longer | ambiguous, see notes | not tested | not tested |
| 4Duracell Quantum | 405 minutes, 1,850 milliamp hours | 1,363 minutes, 2,064 milliamp hours, the best result of any brand at this rate, narrator says the Duracell Quantum barely beat out the Energizer | not tested | not tested |
| 5Duracell | two units tested: 381 minutes/1,747 milliamp hours and 380 minutes/1,738 milliamp hours, described as significantly outperforming the Dollar General battery it was tested against | 1,315 minutes, 2,012 milliamp hours | not tested | not tested |
| 6Rayovacaround 70 cent | 347 minutes, 1,589 milliamp hours | reported as 1,205 minutes/1,844 milliamp hours in the main sequential retest of previously tested brands, but a second, much lower figure of 958 minutes/1,465 milliamp hours appears shortly after in a block where the narrator says he is redoing a mistaken Amazon Basics result and also testing the Rayovac; it is unclear whether that second figure is a correction of this same plain Rayovac reading, a mistake of its own, or actually belongs to the separately named Rayovac Fusion tested earlier at 300 mA. Both figures are recorded here rather than picking one. | not tested | not tested |
| 7Eveready55 cent | 303 minutes, 1,384 milliamp hours | 837 minutes, 1,279 milliamp hours, described as finishing behind the Amazon Basics in the closing value recap despite being a more expensive battery | not tested | not tested |
| 8Amazon Basics | 301 minutes, 1,382 milliamp hours | an initial test result was called a mistake by the narrator and redone; the corrected/final figure given is 1,043 minutes, 1,593 milliamp hours | 37 milliamps per penny, again the best value of all brands at this rate, ahead of the Energizer's nearly 28 milliamps per penny | over 32 milliamps per penny, the best value of all brands tested at this rate, ahead of the Energizer's nearly 26 milliamps per penny |
| 9Dollar General8 batteries for a dollar, or 13 cents each | two units tested: 26 minutes/117 milliamp hours and 35 minutes/158 milliamp hours, described as significantly worse than the Duracell it was tested against | 128 minutes, 193 milliamp hours, described as not even as good as the Harbor Freight Thunderbolt at this rate | not tested | not tested |
| 10Harbor Freight Thunderbolt | 28 minutes, 125 milliamp hours, explicitly called out as worse than the dollar store battery | 181 minutes, 275 milliamp hours | not tested | not tested |
How it was tested
- bounce test methodology demonstration (a battery charge state diagnostic using new versus used Duracells, not a competitive brand metric)
- discharge test at a 300 milliamp drain rate, measuring runtime in minutes and total milliamp hours delivered
- discharge test at a slower 100 milliamp drain rate, measuring runtime in minutes and total milliamp hours delivered
- cost efficiency (milliamp hours produced per penny of purchase price) at both discharge rates
“So, which battery would I buy? I'd likely buy the Energizer just because it seems to be a good balance between price as well as producing a lot of energy.”
Data notes and caveats
Products array is ordered by 300 mA discharge test total milliamp hours, the one metric narrated for all brands, cross checked against the narrator's own comparative statements (e.g. Harbor Freight Thunderbolt explicitly called worse than the Dollar General despite a slightly lower raw average for Dollar General across its two units); rankings shift somewhat at the slower 100 mA rate, most notably Duracell Quantum overtaking Energizer for first place there. The video's central intro question, is Energizer that much better than a 5 dollar generic store battery, is answered narratively rather than with one single crowned winner: the Energizer Lithium was the best raw performer at both rates but explicitly not the best value, the Amazon Basics was explicitly the best value at both rates despite near bottom raw capacity, and the Energizer (regular) is the narrator's own personal pick as the best balance of price and performance, used here as the winner field. A genuine data ambiguity survives in the transcript around the Rayovac brand: the description and affiliate links list only one Rayovac product, but the transcript separately introduces a Rayovac Fusion by name with its own 300 mA figure, then later gives two different, hard to attribute 100 mA figures (1,205 min/1,844 mAh, then 958 min/1,465 mAh) in a passage where the narrator says he is correcting an Amazon Basics mistake and also testing the Rayovac; both figures are preserved and flagged rather than assigned with false confidence to one Rayovac line or the other.